CollectionDX Network

Gundam Avalanche Exia

Comments

6 comments posted
I don't care what the stats

I don't care what the stats and in-canon explanation is: the Exia just looks better without those unnecessary extra panel armor crap that's a poor excuse for a new figure to be released. I mean, how valuable REALLY is skirt armor of all things that you need to reinforce it??? I didn't like that on the V2 Gundam either, it just felt cheap and cheesy.

And the extra blades on its back are facing the wrong way IMO.

EVA_Unit_4A's picture
Posted by EVA_Unit_4A on 17 August, 2011 - 21:08
Bold and Honest

Never expected the grand Joker Eva to make a response like this, but hey, its a bold honest opinion and I respect that!

The Avalanche MSV manual and the RS book shows that the swords are meant to be held upright like that. btw

Rob's picture
Posted by Rob on 18 August, 2011 - 07:44
Y sO sErIoUs?

Y sO sErIoUs?

EVA_Unit_4A's picture
Posted by EVA_Unit_4A on 18 August, 2011 - 11:08
HA!

That's more like it!!

Rob's picture
Posted by Rob on 18 August, 2011 - 11:57
Notice I said "IMO".

I KNOW they're supposed to be held upright like that, I KNOW that's how it was made. What I'm saying is that it doesn't look that great when they're arranged like that.

I actually really like the Exia. It had echoes of the Turn-A, but in a good way. My only problem with it, though, was how stubby the feet looked. Those feet really made it look like it was on peg legs or somethin' weird.

EVA_Unit_4A's picture
Posted by EVA_Unit_4A on 18 August, 2011 - 12:18
I think it looks neat, all

I think it looks neat, all spikey and what not.

Dkun's picture
Posted by Dkun on 17 August, 2011 - 22:11
 
CollectionDX OtakuDX Love is Pop WTF Toy Chogokin.net