Mantech

Review by The Enthusiast
No list of ignored and unloved eighties properties is complete without Remco’s unfortunately-named Mantech. Yikes. Mantech. Mantech was like a beautiful candle which burned very bright, yet all too briefly. Except the flame was kind of stupid looking. And not terribly fun to play with. But funky! A funky flame! Remco was at sea in the mid eighties, Like fellow sixties stalwart Ideal, Remco was desperate to remain relevant in the midst of a modern action-figure explosion. Mantech, like Ideal’s woeful Robo Force, was a quaintly inept attempt to tap into the robo-zeitgeist. I want you to imagine these things on a shelf next to, I dunno, Return of the Jedi toys and Transformers. Mantech never had a chance.
The principal figures, organized into good and evil teams, were cyborgs. There was of course a bland storyline best left un-summarized. Good Guys:
Bad Guys:
Mantech’s gimmick was interchangeability. Interchangeability is good. I love Microman, so this should be good, right? Ehh. While these figures certainly come apart in a modular fashion, the results are less than exciting. All of the components are just too similar. All of the lower legs are subtle variations on chunky boots, all of the arms are subtle variations on chunky arms. All of the weapons are similarly anonymous.
But look, different colors!
The masks show a little promise, though.
Of special note are the soft rubber heads. While lame in the context of contemporaneous toys, I find them charming. The good guys are winningly multi-ethnic, and the bad guys have a great proto-Borg quality.
All of the figures share a clumsy stature which never looks exactly right. The stocky legs are off, and they don’t even work. You can pose the arms and twist the head, but the legs are essentially static. Just balancing the figures in a standing position can be difficult.
The plastic used throughout somehow manages to be both rubbery and brittle. Most Mantech lots on eBay are littered with broken limbs. The nubs at the ends are particularly fragile. Mantech is purely for eighties fetishists. There is little to recommend them other than a certain wistful half-memory of a failed anachronism.
Posted 15 January, 2011 - 17:04 by The Enthusiast |
Comments
6 comments postedNever heard of these guys. Interesting failure.
Aw man, I woulda loved those back in the day! Never heard of them, but that's a BADASS name! MANtech! Yeah! Those suits are probably made for wrestling bears.
mantech... I'm in love.
Mantech was far and away one of my favorite toylines in the 80's. Heh...I only had *one*, but I loved the crap outta that lil dude! Back when Glyos was still largely unknown, Matt Doughty and I would wax poetic about the greatest scifi toylines ever, and this one always came up. If ya think about it, these really are just 7" Glyos figures!
The criticisms are legit, though: the interchangeability is the main gimmick of the line...BUT with all the parts being so similar, it's a tad lame. But then again, Glyos started with just two sculpts for the longest time...in a myriad of different colors! ;)
The best arrangement, though, was sticking another pair of arms onto the shoulders of the arms already on there. You could make a pretty sweet four-armed dude that way!
My favorite feature, however, was the helmets. For some reason, the wild sculpted detail on those helmets really impacted me as a kid. The over-wrought angular "tech" look was SO 80's...but just having a removable helmet was really sweet for some reason. Guess that's why I loved M.A.S.K. toys so much, too!
Oh, Josh, just one minor thing: the purple bad guy is actually "Negatech" (not Nagatech)...guess he's a real Debbie Downer. ;)
I had Solartech, got him at Pic n' Save for a dollar, best dollar I spent on a toy.
While these were interesting and had some good funk, the Centurions line by Tonka stole the thunder from this line with all around better toys and some great vehicle ideas. Later on these would be called ghetto Centurions, but like Gobots vs Transformers - they came before and were fun for other reasons than detail.
...should be used as the photo-description in the dictionary for the definition of the word "funk"
Thanks for reminding me of these haven't thought about the MAN in a while ;)