Toy of the Year 2008 - The Best of the Best

Bandai America 12" Mechagodzilla
4% (26 votes)
Bandai Soul of Chogokin Godmars
35% (203 votes)
Bandai Go-Onger DX Engine Gattai Engine-Oh
7% (41 votes)
Yamato 1/60 VF-1S Super/Strike Valkyrie (Do You Remember Love?)
24% (142 votes)
Hasbro Star Wars Legacy Collection Millennium Falcon
10% (60 votes)
Hasbro Transformers Animated Voyager-class Autobot Optimus Prime (Earth Mode)
8% (45 votes)
Kaiyodo Revoltech Gurren Lagann
11% (63 votes)
Total votes: 580
[categories: ]
duke togo's picture
Submitted by duke togo on 15 January, 2009 - 11:46.

I had to go with Godmars. While the Valk is a great piece, it's just the newest form of something we've had several times before over the 27 years since the TT, not exactly something that is long-awaited or so much better than any previous iteration.

Godmars on the other hand is a great step forward (or backwards?) in the way of re-creating classic chogokin with modern technology.



EVA_Unit_4A's picture
Submitted by EVA_Unit_4A on 15 January, 2009 - 17:50.

Godmars, the new Valks, or OP Earth Mode were the tops for here, so it was hard to decide. All of them are remakes in some form, all based on classic designs, all with long-reaching appeal.

I don't know the GodMars, but it's appealing in a combining robot-way which has a pre-Super Sentai feel.
OP is a classic design, and the Animated ver. is so close to his onscreen counterpart that it's hard to turn away from.

But, I gotta go with the Valkyrie just because- even though I don't have one yet- it feels like the ultimate expression of that mecha. It just pulls at me more than the other two above do. Yes, I know that the VF-1 Valks have been done to death, but my patience has paid off, and Yamato delivered big. It is, finally, what I would consider worthy of standing side-by-side with my Takatoku 1/55 VF-1S Super, and still be called a "toy".
------------------------------
CollectionDX Staff



duke togo's picture
Submitted by duke togo on 15 January, 2009 - 18:08.

I guess it shows how far and wide Macross still reaches that the 20th iteration of the same thing we've been buying all these years still commands a large following.

I'm thinking Godmars biggest weakness is the lack of any real identity since no TV show made it this way (Mighty Orbots doesn't count). Most people only know him from the old Godaikin line.

Either way it's good to see them battling it out, it looks like there really isn't a 3rd contender at this point. Unless a write-in campaign is started for the Takara Scopedog Turbo Custom.



Jetjagaa's picture
Submitted by Jetjagaa on 15 January, 2009 - 12:33.

That Mechagodzilla has no place on any list! BAH!



NekroDave's picture
Submitted by NekroDave on 15 January, 2009 - 14:17.

I agree. All who voted for that should be ashamed of themselves! Even if you didn't buy them, there were much better options than that. Anyway, for the finale, I think I gotta go with the Falcon.

"This must be settled the way nature intended....with a vicious, bloody fight!"
Onyx Blackman
Principal, Flatpoint High



duke togo's picture
Submitted by duke togo on 15 January, 2009 - 18:11.

Well it's only because it won the best vinyl category, which even still is weak since I think the Patlabor vinyls were the best.



Jetjagaa's picture
Submitted by Jetjagaa on 15 January, 2009 - 23:18.

I guess we really need to start submitting more vinyl reviews, just for the righteous mission of having a decent vinyl in the running for next year.



Sanjeev's picture
Submitted by Sanjeev on 16 January, 2009 - 11:43.

Agreed. That's definitely something we've talked about stepping up. There are plenty of new releases on the designer side of things that I'd like to cover more in the coming year. And Nekrodave and JoshB have been doing a great job of covering more mainstream vinyls. Hopefully, we'll be seeing more vinyl coverage in '09!

--
Sanjeev



NekroDave's picture
Submitted by NekroDave on 16 January, 2009 - 11:48.

Off the top of my head, I think Vegetius and Cyclops were the only two new vinyls I bought all last year. :( It's hard to review'em when you aren't getting them.

"This must be settled the way nature intended....with a vicious, bloody fight!"
Onyx Blackman
Principal, Flatpoint High



MobileSuit_Rob's picture
Submitted by MobileSuit_Rob on 16 January, 2009 - 12:09.

I had to vote for the Falcon, sorry but I've seen it in person enough times to appreciate it more than the rest.

Rob
The Gundam Model Guy



Shogundan's picture
Submitted by Shogundan on 16 January, 2009 - 15:48.

I have to agree with you Rob. I too voted for the Falcon, I own it and love it. I do however wish the Toynami Beta made it to the finals. It's definitely my pick for editors choice award.

-Dan
CollectionDX LLC
Vice President/Co-Owner
"the other fat bearded guy at CDX"



duke togo's picture
Submitted by duke togo on 16 January, 2009 - 17:43.

When did this become a Star Wars site?



Shogundan's picture
Submitted by Shogundan on 16 January, 2009 - 18:31.

C'mon Duke,
CollectionDX is a "toy" site first and foremost. Regardless of it being a Star Wars toy, the Falcon is a toy right? See what I am getting at?

-Dan
CollectionDX LLC
Vice President/Co-Owner
"the other fat bearded guy at CDX"



Germanicus's picture
Submitted by Germanicus on 16 January, 2009 - 17:33.

I think the reason why the "new and improved" 1/60 DYRL Valkyrie is losing by more than 10% against the SOC Godmars is because people kind of gotten sick with Yamato's "milking" of the Macross brand (1/60 scale, 1/48 scale, oh let's do another 1/60 scale...you get my point). It's a great piece of engineering and quality- if only this was the first and only one they've released. You don't see the GODAIKIN line and other great chogokin lines in years past (70's and 80's)doing a rehash. It coulda been a contendah!

Just an observation.



duke togo's picture
Submitted by duke togo on 16 January, 2009 - 17:58.

10% is still too close to call at this point so I wouldn't count out a last-minute turnout of votes.

While I've stated my position on the matter, I'll play Devil's advocate for Yamato here.

They used what they learned making the last few iterations of the Valks and other toys to finally nail what many consider the true successor to the TT design. Combine that with a price point and quality level that allows folks that passed on the previous releases to take the plunge and finally get a valk (some for the very first time). That does deserve some amount of respect and recognition.



RobotBastard's picture
Submitted by RobotBastard on 18 January, 2009 - 15:49.

I, for example, have really always just wanted "a better 1/55 Takatoku". The 1/60 Yamato looks like it fits right in there, and I think I'll get one when the tax refund rolls in.



Germanicus's picture
Submitted by Germanicus on 20 January, 2009 - 21:36.

were going to make 3-4 versions of the same veritech (ex. VF-1J, Focker VF-1S). So what happens to the people who bought the first version or even the second version. Wouldn't that tick them off? Your lucky you didn't buy one of the early ones but what about the others who did? They would feel cheated because like I said before no one predicted they were going to "milk" the line for better versions.



duke togo's picture
Submitted by duke togo on 21 January, 2009 - 16:35.

I bought just about every iteration of the VF-1 since the TT in 1983, so I don't feel cheated that they made yet another version. I think by now it's expected that any company that gets the Macross License will "milk" the line since every company has done exactly that.



Rodimus78's picture
Submitted by Rodimus78 on 20 January, 2009 - 23:37.

"While I've stated my position on the matter, I'll play Devil's advocate for Yamato here.

They used what they learned making the last few iterations of the Valks and other toys to finally nail what many consider the true successor to the TT design. Combine that with a price point and quality level that allows folks that passed on the previous releases to take the plunge and finally get a valk (some for the very first time). That does deserve some amount of respect and recognition."

Sigh....Oh Duke, what a very odious thing to do. You're telling people what they've already read and heard. You've insulted the intelligence of every person who had bought yamato's stuff before hand. Christ...are you for real?

Another thing, you really need to quit hiding the company's dirty diapers. We can smell that stench miles away from your closet . Yamato didn't ask you to be babysitter, did they?
They've acknowledged their mistakes and made an effort to rectify the valks in their own right. That being said, the end product speaks for itself. That shows an honorable mention worthy for this competition.

You playing that kind of game....not so honorable...not so brave...not so healthy...not so clean in my book.

-R78



duke togo's picture
Submitted by duke togo on 21 January, 2009 - 17:36.

I'm not sure what you're implying.

I've bought many products from Yamato, only one of which suffered from poor quality (1st Garland). The few original 1/60 valks I bought were good for the time and while not Kanzen Henkei, they reminded me of the old 1/72 variable kits I had so I liked them. The Q Rau was probably the biggest letdown but it was the only Q Rau toy ever so that counted for something.

The 1/48 line was superb, I own 3 of them with some armor kits and never had the slightest issue with them. I felt the price was in line with what you were getting, a high-end toy with a price on par with a PG Gundam kit of the same size.

The new 1/60 line is great, costs less, and is a great melding of the size/quality of the two previous lines. Plus it looks like it will be the line that finally gets folks some long-overdue versions that previously were only possible with customizing.

I'm no Graham of Macross World in terms of putting them on a pedestal. The first 1/60 line got too expensive near the end. The way they handled the 1/48 line in terms of what got made was bizarre, the number of low viz and stealth releases and the time it took to make them instead of things like a Max TV or 1D was infuriating. The Q Rau was overpriced. I never bought any of the Plus or Zero stuff since I don't care for their design/story.

I'm just pleased to see them doing with Macross what I've wanted them (or anybody in fact) to do: make the versions of Valks most of us have been wanting since the TT days and do some of the Destroids and possibly some enemy stuff. So far that is what we are seeing in this line (no regults yet) and it's admirable to see them do it.

If it was Bandai or CM's, or even Toynami I'd be just as happy with them. So if my comments on Yamato finally getting to what I've been wanting someone to do seems like I'm hiding their "dirty diapers", I fail to see how I'm going about that.

Feel free to air out the hamper and explain just what Yamato did to you that was so wrong. Did they force you you to buy Valks over and over? Are their toys on par with Toynami in terms of bad QC? I own just as many Toynami MP toys as I do Yamato and none of them are shoddy or suffer from poor QC. So maybe I just got lucky 15 times in a row.

I've heard the later Plus and Zero toys were more prone to QC issues, and combined with their $200+ prices made folks upset (with good reason). But since I never owned or handled those toys I can't comment on them with any validity. I speak from personal experience, not rhetoric or hearsay from message boards. So far I've seen one bad toy from them out of the dozen or so I own, so the whole idea of them being money-hungry and putting out crap just seems like sour grapes from folks that can't afford what they release, or people who happened to get a faulty item and feels the need to go to every avenue and scream Yamato sucks until it becomes a common misconception.



krakit's picture
Submitted by krakit on 18 January, 2009 - 01:56.

[rant]

One way to increase the number of
voters is for some web designer to
create a poll that includes photos/images for each
of the choices.

I almost went right past this poll. It's a
boring block of text compared to the cool
visuals (photos and videos) for the toy
reviews I'm used to seeing on this site.

It seems to me that it wouldn't be that
hard for a programmer to set up polls that
can display photos also. Why isn't this an
option on all polls by now? I'm not aiming
these questions at collectiondx. I'm hoping
you guys ask whoever provides the system for
the polls why the polls are text only. We're
living in 2008 with cool touchscreen technology
flowin' out our ears. Why do our polls over
the entire web have to look so dry and boring?

[/rant]

As it is right now I'm just not in the mood
to look up each toy in the list to figure
out exactly which ones they are among the
hundreds(thousands?) of toys that came out
this year.

I guess there can be 2 approaches to polls and
they both are valid. One way encourages only
hardcore fans to participate while the other
encourages everyone to participate including
casual fans.

Hopefully I didn't come across as too cranky.
It's 2am and maybe I should be asleep instead
of ranting.



JoshB's picture
Submitted by JoshB on 18 January, 2009 - 09:42.

One of the things that is lacking with the system we use is the poll module. I would love for the ability to post images and links with each poll option, as well as some descriptive text below the title.

Unfortunately, the system we use to run CDX is getting kind of old, and people don't develop much for it anymore. When we upgrade sometime in 09, we should have more options available to us.

------------------------------
CollectionDX Admin



krakit's picture
Submitted by krakit on 19 January, 2009 - 22:00.

Thanks, Josh, for the information

I've seen about 3 polls on various blogs or
websites related to voting for the top toys
of 2008 and none of them had photos. One did
include links. So I'm not focused on
collectiondx as much as the poor support from
programmers who can develop the neat bells
and whistles that make the internet so
interesting.

When you upgrade be sure to back up all
your data and don't solely rely on whoever
you hire to keep your data safe. I remember
when Threadless.com did an upgrade years ago
and so many people's blogs/comments vanished
never to be seen again.



megatroptimus's picture
Submitted by megatroptimus on 20 January, 2009 - 01:19.

I voted for Godmars. I think we should be voting for toys, not their background. Godmars is a fantastic combiner with a lot of attention to detail. Runner-up for me would have been SOC Daimos.



Rodimus78's picture
Submitted by Rodimus78 on 21 January, 2009 - 05:31.

'sniff' 'sniff' I'm graciously disappointed that BT-Convoy didn't make it to the list. It really deserved to be on that list. Oh Convoy you are so magnificent to me this past year. So pure, so intelligent, so complexed, so honest, so respectable, so chogokin, and yet so unperverted.

Well...in all fairness, I'm glad that Animated Prime made it on there since that it wasn't perverted like most the fanboys thought it so at 1st sight except for me. It got my respect but not my vote.

My vote for the B.O.T_B goes out to Godmars. That toy definitely kick ass. I want to vote for the 1/60 valkyrie, but that Godmars really pulled my interest away from the Macross jet.

SOC Godmars, you got my vote #171.

Sorry Yamato....Sorry Jermey....Sorry Andrew....Sorry Atom....Sorry Kawamori-san....Really....I'm serious....I'm not just saying that....I mean it too.

I'm not kidding....at all.

-R78



Shogundan's picture
Submitted by Shogundan on 20 January, 2009 - 19:13.

I've been keeping an eye on the TOTY since the pole went up and I am truly surprised that the Millennium Falcon is not doing better. Do any of our readers even own the toy? The toy is freakin' phenomenal. Its huge, tons of play value and is quite possibly the very best Star Wars toy the world has seen. Now it looks as if a $20 Gurren Lagann Revoltech might best it. Dont get me wrong, I love Gurren Lagann, Its just that the figure doesn't even compare to the coolness of the MF.

-Dan
CollectionDX LLC
Vice President/Co-Owner
"the other fat bearded guy at CDX"



Rodimus78's picture
Submitted by Rodimus78 on 20 January, 2009 - 20:52.

Well Dan that's just the problem for me. I don't own the toy and I'm not really interested in it.

For the time being, it's too huge for me to own in my room.

Second of all it's complacent. I get eventually bored of playing a big flying saucer like that. I rather build the thing from scratch than buy something that's already built.

Third, It's not a battle fortress transformer. It's an oversized model of a Corellian starhopper. If it were the Battlestar Macross SDF-1 or G1 Fortress Maximus or G1 Omega Supreme or even a G1 Metroplex that size and transformable. Yeah, I would resolute my huge issue to buy anyone of those things. That right there is my money's worth.

-R78



Shogundan's picture
Submitted by Shogundan on 21 January, 2009 - 07:53.

I totally feel you on the fact that the MF is huge. I had to actually hang it from my office ceiling with the 31 other Star Wars ships I own. My point was that its hard to believe that it is being beaten by a Revoltech? Dont get me wrong the Revoltech is very cool in its own right, but doesn't even come close to the MF is play value and shelve presence.

-Dan
CollectionDX LLC
Vice President/Co-Owner
"the other fat bearded guy at CDX"



Rodimus78's picture
Submitted by Rodimus78 on 22 January, 2009 - 06:37.

You're absolutely right Dan,

The MF is a phenomenal playset, and it's surprising that it's neck of the poll is shorter than the Revoltech GG by a margin.

BTW, that's pretty creative that you've hung the MF on your office ceiling. If only you got an ovesized Star Destroyer toy to hang on there with a half-sized MF.... Dude, that galaxy won't be that far away from work.

-R78



megatroptimus's picture
Submitted by megatroptimus on 21 January, 2009 - 22:30.

Thinking about it, it would rank #2. It's a phenomenal toy. If I was a SW fan, I'd be in heaven.