<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
	<channel>
		<title>Comments on: CM&#039;s Coproration AV-0 Peacemaker Labor</title>
		<link>http://www.collectiondx.com/node/2003</link>
		<description>CollectionDX-Japanese Toys - Toy Reviews, Toy News and Toy Collections. Soul of Chogokin, Japanese Robots | International Toy Culture</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 23:42:48 -0500</pubDate>
		<generator>Drupal TotalFeeds Module</generator>
				
			<item>
		<title>That&#039;s kind of what it is.</title>
		<link>http://www.collectiondx.com/node/2003%2523comment-1077</link>
		<description>That&#039;s kind of what it is.  The AV-X0 is from the movie, while this AV-0 Peacemaker is from the TV series.  Well, that&#039;s what I&#039;ve read.  The first movie is one my personal top mecha classics, but I&#039;ve never watched the TV series.  That Peacemaker looks good, but I wish they&#039;ll do an AV-X0 too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That's kind of what it is.  The AV-X0 is from the movie, while this AV-0 Peacemaker is from the TV series.  Well, that's what I've read.  The first movie is one my personal top mecha classics, but I've never watched the TV series.  That Peacemaker looks good, but I wish they'll do an AV-X0 too.</p><br class="giImageBlock-clear-both" />]]></content:encoded>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 23:42:48 -0500</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>krimpov</dc:creator>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.collectiondx.com/node/2003%2523comment-1077</guid>
							</item>
		<item>
		<title>That looks more like a</title>
		<link>http://www.collectiondx.com/node/2003%2523comment-1043</link>
		<description>  That looks more like a &lt;em&gt;variant&lt;/em&gt; of the AV-X0 Type Zero patlabor rather than &lt;em&gt;being&lt;/em&gt; it...  Is this supposed to be the Type-Zero itself, or is it a different model of patlabor altogether?  &lt;strong&gt;O.o?&lt;/strong&gt;
------------------------------
CollectionDX Staff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>  That looks more like a <em>variant</em> of the AV-X0 Type Zero patlabor rather than <em>being</em> it...  Is this supposed to be the Type-Zero itself, or is it a different model of patlabor altogether?  <strong>O.o?</strong><br />
------------------------------<br />
CollectionDX Staff</p><br class="giImageBlock-clear-both" />]]></content:encoded>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 15:21:21 -0500</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>EVA_Unit_4A</dc:creator>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.collectiondx.com/node/2003%2523comment-1043</guid>
							</item>
		</channel>
	</rss>
	