CollectionDX Network

Tamashii Nations 2009: Macross

Comments

31 comments posted
Thanks for the fantastic

Thanks for the fantastic coverage so far Josh! The SOC shots and these look amazing. The photos for the Mazinger UMC look great even if the toy leaves me confused... get some rest tho, you've earned it. We'll all be expecting the rest of the report bright and early tomorrow!

Prometheum5's picture
Posted by Prometheum5 on 25 March, 2009 - 10:45
Like the armored Valkyrie and the standard ones beneath it...

...but the first one bugs me.
The feet look like they were trying to emulate the (eesh) designs seen in the newer Transformers movies. Likewise, the shoulder configuration is NO.

If it were a mecha designed just for space, sure, why not?
But in a place of gravity, having the upper arm connect to a platform hanging waaay off from the torso is somewhat nonsensical.
Something also seems "wrong" with a shield and gun so huge that one can't stand without them resting on the ground...

Liking the green Valk. I never saw the source, so is that separating radar dish meant to double as a weapon? Looks kind of blade-y.

I like how the deco on the VF-25S looks like Roy Fokker's dress uniform from the old series lol. Awesome.

The teensy hands (versus the LARGE ones of old) take some getting used to, but I find them more realistic this way.

JINZONINGEN 73's picture
Posted by JINZONINGEN 73 on 25 March, 2009 - 11:36
Re: Like the armored Valkyrie and the standard ones beneath it..

"...If it were a mecha designed just for space, sure, why not?
But in a place of gravity, having the upper arm connect to a platform hanging waaay off from the torso is somewhat nonsensical.
Something also seems "wrong" with a shield and gun so huge that one can't stand without them resting on the ground...
"

Well, let us think here for a moment if you wanna go that way: the human form as a space combat vehicle is rather impractical. While large thick limbs would make for okay counter-rotation, the only reason you have them is to reach out for something. Beyond that- despite innumerable anime to the contrary- maneuvering thrusters are your best bet.
Besides, the human body is far from the best example you want to use as a giant space combat vehicle! Compared to other animals, it is pathetic, with little naturally inherent strength, endurance, or dexterity without extensive & continuous exercise. It doesn't take blows well either. Heh- Klingons we ain't!

And you're right on the money as far as feet in a space-capable vehicle. Small landing gear are appropriate for cushioned docking, but unless you have massively-powerful magnets- and assuming that there's anything appropriate to attract them in space to begin with- walking on a zero gravity object also becomes impractical and pointless. Now, if you have a multi-purpose vehicle that can de-orbit successfully on its own, and is required to walk about on land, then you have a need for big legs.
Of course, lest we forget, a VF-1 Valkyrie would sink under its own weight with every single step with a footprint that puny! (Admittedly, later Valks have attempted to counter this, like the above...)

. . .

I would go so far as to submit the Neue Ziel mobile armor from "Mobile Suit Gundam 0083- Stardust Memory" as my Exhibit "A".

Having [regretfully] not seen it in action yet, I do know that it only has two small-ish arms which it only deploys for grappling (physical wrestling in space is an extremely inefficient use of fuel, BTW) or being psychologically menacing beyond its immense size and intimidating-pea green coloring. It is more-or-less a scaled-down space cruiser (as most space-combat vehicles are that are human-shaped, in general), and it should be treated as such. All built-in or retractable weaponry (psycommu weapons and quasi-invisible energy shields notwithstanding), external fuel tanks (required reaction mass for actually moving it's thousand-ton bulk, and you're telling me that its rockets are that efficient?), projectile claws for grabbing distant objects (a likely outcome for a close-range fighter, though perhaps without the rockets on the ends, meh?), it does not waste effort or risk breaking tiny joints/internal structures that completely ignore split-second mass-shifting/inertia on being transformable (have you seen the hip trans. joints on the VF-0A/S Phoenix!?), and- perhaps most importantly- it does not have legs & feet!

...crap, I forgot what I was gonna use for my closing argument.

(*instinctively ducks for holes to be shot through his opinion*)
------------------------------
CollectionDX Staff

EVA_Unit_4A's picture
Posted by EVA_Unit_4A on 25 March, 2009 - 13:27
"The feet look like they

"The feet look like they were trying to emulate the (eesh) designs seen in the newer Transformers movies. Likewise, the shoulder configuration is NO."

You're misinformed my friend...The crappy B-Formers designs has NOTHING to do with the Macross Quarter. Totally and coincidentally BULLSLAG. The Quarter's feet really looks like it's inspired from the Anti-UN SV-51 Valks seen on Macross Zero.

Also, it looks obvious that the Quarter's upper and middle body looks very much inspired by Tekkaman Blade.

....FYI....Macross Zero came way before B-Formers did. It's not a great OVA, but it's way better than B-Formers.

Heh, heh, heh, heh, heh,....B-Formers....oh my...SIGH...Where the heck do I get these crazy ideas?

PS: Danny Choo...if you're reading this....hear me out..one of your recent moe articles had the headline 'Moelicious'.....THAT'S MY IDEA YOU JERK!! LOL!!!

-R78

Rodimus78's picture
Posted by Rodimus78 on 25 March, 2009 - 13:33
Realistic? Are you f'reals?

OK, so the place where your suspension of disbelief at a 1000 foot tall robot broke down, is because you don't buy the shoulder joint?

Dude. They have anti-gravity. Architecture is now irrelevant.

moofie's picture
Posted by moofie on 26 March, 2009 - 02:16
Re: Realistic? Are you f'reals?

I'd be more concerned about anti-inertia (aka inertial dampening fields) than anti-gravity in any giant transforming robot. You HAVE to make those components lighter in that moment unless you want the superstructure(s) to crumple beneath the torquing of the transformation & movement joints.

And keep in mind, any ship this big is mostly hollow! (Same with the legs of any variable fighter with engines in the legs)
------------------------------
CollectionDX Staff

EVA_Unit_4A's picture
Posted by EVA_Unit_4A on 26 March, 2009 - 03:44
"Something also seems

"Something also seems "wrong" with a shield and gun so huge that one can't stand without them resting on the ground...

Liking the green Valk. I never saw the source, so is that separating radar dish meant to double as a weapon? Looks kind of blade-y."

You must not have seen too much of Macross... the first one is the Macross Quarter, a Battleship like the original SDF-1 Macross which transforms into a super-ridiculous robot mode for combat maneuverability in space (no gravity). The radar dish is just a radar dish teched up to look more sci-fi... when has anyone in Macross had a folding blade weapon?

Prometheum5's picture
Posted by Prometheum5 on 25 March, 2009 - 11:58
And it's not a shield on the

And it's not a shield on the Quarter--it's essentially a gigantic aircraft carrier from which the Valkyrie fighters below launch!

But I agree, unless the toy can manage to hold the main gun and the carrier out straight (at the elbows, not at the shoulders), this is pretty much a bust. It's gotta have the classic SDF pose...

By the way, Ben, the Ozma version Valk above has a combat knife, the VF-11's gunpod features a bayonet...and if you wanna extend "Macross" to Mospeada, you have the CADS-1 blades on the VR-041 Cyclone.

--
Sanjeev

Sanjeev's picture
Posted by Sanjeev on 25 March, 2009 - 13:24
One word on your second paragraph:

Aff!

------------------------------
CollectionDX Staff

EVA_Unit_4A's picture
Posted by EVA_Unit_4A on 25 March, 2009 - 13:28
"and if you wanna extend

"and if you wanna extend "Macross" to Mospeada, you have the CADS-1 blades on the VR-041 Cyclone."

No. Just no. Stop it.

-Andrew

Destroy All Podcasts DX's picture
Posted by Destroy All Pod... on 25 March, 2009 - 13:46
Actually, it is a shield

There's a scene in the last episode where it uses the flight deck to deflect a beam cannon shot.

Also, it can concentrate its pinpoint barriers onto the edge and use it like a gigantic sword.

RobotBastard's picture
Posted by RobotBastard on 25 March, 2009 - 20:30
"By the way, Ben, the Ozma

"By the way, Ben, the Ozma version Valk above has a combat knife, the VF-11's gunpod features a bayonet...and if you wanna extend "Macross" to Mospeada, you have the CADS-1 blades on the VR-041 Cyclone."

I know about those (all the VF-25s have the combat knife stored in the shield, which is basically a vibroblade I think), but small CQC weapons are totally different from the spinning blade boomerang suggested...

And yeah, the shoulder joints are going to be make-or-break on the Quarter being a fun toy.

Prometheum5's picture
Posted by Prometheum5 on 25 March, 2009 - 13:38
Andrew: hey, he asked, dude!

Andrew: hey, he asked, dude! ;)

Ben: I gotcha. Just saying...

But anyway, Andrew brought up a good point on TBDX, where the parallel universe version of this discussion is going on. He said that in the cartoon, the Quarter actually mounts the carrier/flight deck on the battroid's(?) back, and grips the main gun with both hands in order to fire it. I'd forgotten about this detail. So, if the toy can pull off that pose, it might be cool.

Still, I'm hoping that the 2' Yamato DYRL comes out great..and that they make a tv version soon after with the inevitable improved joints! ;P

--
Sanjeev

Sanjeev's picture
Posted by Sanjeev on 25 March, 2009 - 15:24
"Still, I'm hoping that the

"Still, I'm hoping that the 2' Yamato DYRL comes out great..and that they make a tv version soon after with the inevitable improved joints! ;P"

You do realize that the DYRL and TV designs for the Macross don't even have the same joints. Like in the arms, the TV design has a simple double jointed elbow while the DYRL design has those bendy arms.

-Andrew

Destroy All Podcasts DX's picture
Posted by Destroy All Pod... on 25 March, 2009 - 20:03
Have you even seen Macross Frontier?

Complaints about simple aesthetics who got what idea or mecha look from where etc... who you kidding! If you saw Macross Frontier the Quarter makes perfect sense in it's form with weaponry, plus it's a cartoon kids imagination need apply. It's one badass ship, don't hand me this Transformers or Tekkman bullish. These are great designs done by some talented artists.

Larkin

Lizardspock's picture
Posted by Lizardspock on 25 March, 2009 - 20:18
I've been hearing that they

I've been hearing that they fixed/ corrected the neck issue in ozma's Valkyrie the resin cast looks good though. really want to get one now.

oh.. and macross quarter in action:

GrayFox's picture
Posted by GrayFox on 25 March, 2009 - 22:09
I fixed it for ya. Just

I fixed it for ya. Just copy/paste the "embed" code from the page next time. :)

"This must be settled the way nature intended....with a vicious, bloody fight!"
Onyx Blackman
Principal, Flatpoint High

NekroDave's picture
Posted by NekroDave on 25 March, 2009 - 22:39
thanks i dont think being

thanks i dont think being bummed out and tired helped my intelligence when i posted that.

GrayFox's picture
Posted by GrayFox on 26 March, 2009 - 14:36
Yeah, I saw that clip

Yeah, I saw that clip months ago. While it might be about time that a Macross-class ship finally engaged in real 'hand-to-hand combat', the Quarter still doesn't work for me. Granted the animation is fluid and the battle is appropriately intense, but the mecha designs just kill it for me. Of course regardless of that, I still truly do wanna see "Macross Frontier" in its entirety.
------------------------------
CollectionDX Staff

EVA_Unit_4A's picture
Posted by EVA_Unit_4A on 26 March, 2009 - 02:08
Macross Class Vessels in Frontier

We're only seeing the toy for the Quarter there are still two more SDF size ships in the anime they'll make toys of down the road...

Larkin

Lizardspock's picture
Posted by Lizardspock on 26 March, 2009 - 08:37
.......

If you want to see the show entirely, you should quit judging a book by its cover and take a leap of faith....it wouldn't wound your pride but it might heal your prejudice.

-R78

Rodimus78's picture
Posted by Rodimus78 on 27 March, 2009 - 04:24
Re: .......

If I were prejudice, I would have said that I didn't want to see it at all based solely on the mecha designs. That is not the case, as I've said [now-several times] before.
------------------------------
CollectionDX Staff

EVA_Unit_4A's picture
Posted by EVA_Unit_4A on 27 March, 2009 - 05:08
Don't be so modest

Don't be so modest 'Mr. C'... What you've been saying is merely the icing on the case is what you've been smacking on.

Love it, hate it, or betray it...you will watch to show and probably get the toys you claimed to dislike.

It's just like what a famous illusionist once said, "Even though people will hate the show, they'll comeback for more in order to send us hate mail".

That's purely evident in the finances of commercial merchandising. Just ask the yehsayers in the closets for Yamato Toys.

-R78

Rodimus78's picture
Posted by Rodimus78 on 31 March, 2009 - 19:23
LOL we're still just talking

LOL we're still just talking about a robot anime right?

kidnicky's picture
Posted by kidnicky on 27 March, 2009 - 05:55
LOL

LOL....looks like we're talking about both...might as well.

-R78

Rodimus78's picture
Posted by Rodimus78 on 27 March, 2009 - 12:29
"You must not have seen too much of Macross... "

Oh, I've seen tons of Macross... decades worth. : p
Never got around to seeing this one though. TOTALLY slipped under my radar.
Speaking of radar...

"The radar dish is just a radar dish teched up to look more sci-fi... "

Thanks Hades for that. It uses a feature used on so many toys of the past (mostly shields for action figures?) and I was under the impression radar arrays primarily need to retain a certain, specific shape.
We're also talkin' anime here. Never having seen this version, the whole show could've been about kids channeling their love into energy for weapons that transform lol.

"combat maneuverability in space (no gravity)."

More good news lol.

That vid posted above was quite crazy. Looked like a mix between like Macross, Evangelion and any anime with tentacles as walls.
Maybe I'll hunt the series down when (I get a bigger hard drive) Gundam 00 finishes up tomorrow.

JINZONINGEN 73's picture
Posted by JINZONINGEN 73 on 27 March, 2009 - 00:48
Could a mech hurt itself?

Now say for instance the Macross Quarter lost control of it right arm cannon is it possible it could shoot off it's left arm fight deck? Or would it use it's own barrier shield to defect it's arm?

Another questions, since Transformers are hulks of moving metal how come they never dent or scratch there own body surface? Please this is an important question is there an answer?

Larkin

Lizardspock's picture
Posted by Lizardspock on 27 March, 2009 - 15:53
Re: Could a mech hurt itself?

Well... can you hurt yourself intentionally or unintentionally? For any giant robot living or not, I imagine the risks are the same, we just don't see it happen very often.

To answer the second question:

For practical and financial purposes for anime production companies, such minute details of intricate maintenance as usually not elaborated on unless there is a specific plot point to coincide with showing such an act.

Now, if you're talking about Transformers(TM), as I stated above, they are living beings, so the chances of them hurting themselves is just as likely as it is with any biological life-form. This is why a field medic Transformer character is usually around (unless, of course, you're talking about Bay-formers Ratchet... ugh!). But, again, you usually don't see the repair process; it is simply implied or seen vaguely at a distance.
------------------------------
CollectionDX Staff

EVA_Unit_4A's picture
Posted by EVA_Unit_4A on 27 March, 2009 - 18:16
"hulks of moving metal how come they never dent body surface?"

As I remember from reading the translated Gundam books way back when, they supposedly utilize a magnetic shielding, a coat of lubricating particles around points of friction.

In other words, the two halves moving next to each other never really ever make contact.

JINZONINGEN 73's picture
Posted by JINZONINGEN 73 on 27 March, 2009 - 17:04
In the UC timeline, the

In the UC timeline, the introduction of the test model RX-78-3 Gundam "G-3" brought about the magnetic coating system. The superior improvements its demonstrated would later be used to upgrade the classic RX-78-2 Gundam in the series; the later MSV appearance of the G-3 justifies this in the earlier anime series.
So what you said, JIN, is correct.
------------------------------
CollectionDX Staff

EVA_Unit_4A's picture
Posted by EVA_Unit_4A on 27 March, 2009 - 18:04
In Transformers comics,they

In Transformers comics,they show dents and scratches and stuff all the time. And in the live action movie,they do have scuffed and scratched paint in robot mode,at least.

kidnicky's picture
Posted by kidnicky on 27 March, 2009 - 20:11
 
CollectionDX OtakuDX Love is Pop WTF Toy Chogokin.net